Modern Art Recalled: The idea recall may or may not involve guilty conduct ; tainly the outcome of the recall election, even mfavorable, carries no stigma of disability for ther officeholding. The person recalled may ply have incurred political disfavor. A gov-or of North Dakota, recalled in 1920, was r elected to the United States Senate, where served several terms.
In an attempt to cut off supplies to the rebels, he ordered all peasants to gather in or near towns occupied by Spanish troops, a policy that led to hundreds of deaths by starvation and disease. Public opinion in the United States, already on the side of the rebels, was roused to new heights, and Weyler was recalled to Spain in 1897. He later served as minister of war in two Spanish cabinets, and as captain general of Madrid; in the latter capacity, he quelled the riots following the execution of Francisco Ferrer Guar-dia in 1909 (see FERRER GUARDIA, FRANCISCO). He retired as chief of staff of the Spanish Army in 1920, but was recalled to active service the following year by King Alfonso. As late as 1927, at the age of 89, he was accused of plotting against the government of Primo de Rivera, but was acquitted by a military court.
It will be recalled that a similar belief motivated Hamlet to avenge the murder of his father. In later ages, courts were established to try the accused and to administer punishments as prescribed by tradition and by law. Perhaps the most famous court was the Council of Areopagus in Athens, where punishment entirely replaced vengeance.
The system of punishments upon which modern art recalled legal procedures are based was developed in the days of the republic in Rome. Courts of law were empowered to inflict sentences after a trial by jury. Until the days of decadence, the accused had many rights under the law, and punishments were not summarily inflicted. The Twelve Tables (c.450 B.C.) unambiguously defined the major offenses and specified the punishments.
|
|